Rabinowitz, Lubetkin & Tully, LLC

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Lawyers
    • Jonathan I. Rabinowitz
    • Jay L. Lubetkin
    • Barry J. Roy
    • Jeffrey A. Cooper
    • Henry M. Karwowski
    • Justin Baumgartner
  • Practice Areas
    • Bankruptcy
      • Corporate Bankruptcy
      • Personal Bankruptcy
      • Creditors’ Rights
      • State Court Insolvency
    • Complex Commercial Litigation
    • Commercial Real Estate
    • Family Law and Bankruptcy
  • Blog
    • Videos
  • FAQ
    • Corporate Bankruptcy
    • Personal Bankruptcy
    • State Court Insolvency
    • Commercial Real Estate
    • Family Law and Bankruptcy
    • Commercial Litigation
  • Contact
(973) 597-9100
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Uncategorized
  • SUPREMES RULE ON TWO BANKRUPTCY CASES

SUPREMES RULE ON TWO BANKRUPTCY CASES

SUPREMES RULE ON TWO BANKRUPTCY CASES

by rltlawfirm / Tuesday, 27 March 2018 / Published in Uncategorized
Supreme Court
The United States Supreme Court recently ruled in two bankruptcy cases.  First, in Harris v. Viegelahn the Supreme Court held unanimously that a Chapter 13 debtor who converts to Chapter 7 is entitled to the return of any post petition wages not already distributed by the Chaper 13 Trustee.  The Supreme Court’s ruling reversed a decision of the Fifth Circuit that held that a former trustee was authorized to distribute a debtor’s post-petition wages despite conversion.
Secondly, in Bullard v. Blue Hills Bank,the Supreme Court affirmed an order of the First Circuit Court of Appeals dismissing the appeal of a Chapter 13 debtor for lack of jurisdiction.  The Supreme Court held that the order of the Bankruptcy Court denying confirmation of the debtor’s Chapter 13 plan was not a final order from which the debtor could immediately appeal as a matter of right.  The Supreme Court reasoned that denial of confirmation is not a final order as the debtor is entitled to file an amended plan of reorganization.
The Supreme Court’s decision in Bullard may have a significant impact in bankruptcy cases in this Circuit, as courts in the Third Circuit, including the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, have held that an order denying confirmation in Chapter 11 cases are final orders, appealable as a matter of right.
  • Tweet

What you can read next

RLT WINS AGAIN IN REVEL CASE
JAY L. LUBETKIN TO BE FEATURED PRESENTER AT NBI CONFERENCE ON COMMERCIAL LEASES
ATTORNEY SPOTLIGHT

Recent Posts

  • Jon, Jay and Jeff Recognized by Chambers USA for 15th Straight Year

    Rabinowitz Lubetkin & Tully, LLC is pleased...
  • Rabinowitz Lubetkin & Tully Attorneys Once Again Recognized by Super Lawyers

    Jonathan Rabinowitz, Jay Lubetkin and Jeffrey C...
  • Rabinowitz Lubetkin & Tully Welcomes Justin Baumgartner

    In order to continue to provide our clients wit...
  • Jonathan Rabinowitz

    Jonathan Rabinowitz Recognized by Best Lawyers

    Rabinowitz Lubetkin & Tully is proud that J...
  • Rabinowitz Lubetkin & Tully is Pleased that Our Attorneys Have Been Recognized by Best Lawyers in America® in its 2025 Edition

    Rabinowitz Lubetkin & Tully, LLC is pleased...

Categories

  • Case Studies
  • Law
  • Uncategorized

ABOUT US

Rabinowitz, Lubetkin & Tully, LLC is a six (6) lawyer firm that focuses its practice in the areas of bankruptcy, civil litigation, and commercial real estate. RLT’s attorneys are leaders in their field. Chambers USA, which lists America’s leading lawyers for business, and is a highly-respected legal directory based on in-depth interviews with in-house counsel and private practice attorneys, recently ranked RLT ahead of many larger well-respected firms. RLT was described as "deliver[ing] effective, timely and beneficial services that yielded favorable results." RLT was also noted as "hav[ing] tremendous knowledge and [the ability to] do timely and efficient work."

CONTACT US

(973) 597-9100

Fax: (973) 597-9119

SUBSCRIBE TO NEWSLETTER

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • FAQ
  • Contact

Powered by Today's Business | Legal Notices | All Rights Reserved

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

TOP